Dear Chief Secretary to the Treasury,
I'm afraid to tell you there's no money left.
Signed, Liam Byrne

(Outgoing Labour Chief Secretary to the Treasury. May 2010)
.
.

Thursday, 4 March 2010

How to make a mess of your keyboard in two easy stages.

Here's an easy way to mess up your keyboard.

Step one :- Take mouthful of coffee/tea/beer/whisky/water.

Step two :- Carefully read this from Dick Puddlecote, and then this via Reuters.

If steps one and two didn't destroy your keyboard then you will need

Step three :- Read this from An Englishman's Castle.

From the last link you will learn that writing something as innocuous as "Summer 2012" or "London 2012" will be against the law if you are a trader. Imaginative, or creative, use of language will be dealt with because
(6) The Secretary of State may by order add, remove or vary an entry in either group of expressions.....
Imagine trying to sell a summer holiday, in the year 2012!
....

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Lord Ashcroft

Mrs Rigby has already blown a gasket over at Mr Dale's place, which was probably a bit silly, but she's getting heartily sick of 'decent people' being done over by those who try to hide their own misdemeanours behind weasel words. There's no point in her trying, personally, to compare Lord Ashcroft with other peers, because other people can do it extremely well. Guido, for instance, has a thing, or two, or three to say.

It wasn't until Mrs R saw the comment on Iain Dale's place that compared putting together a collection of Victoria Crosses with 'collecting butterflies' that she got cross. Getting cross about something is all relative, and is to do with knowing or understanding what's going on, and she couldn't really see why there was such a fuss about this non-dom stuff, mainly because it would never be likely to affect her and hers, not in a zillion years, so it washed right over her head.

But Mrs Rigby rather likes butterflies you see, and doesn't like to think of people sticking pins in them, especially not rare British ones, and she shuddered at the concept of likening that 'hobby' to collecting the VCs which are ...
the highest military decoration which is, or has been, awarded for valour "in the face of the enemy" to members of the armed forces of various Commonwealth countries, and previous British Empire territories.
... and which only tend to end up being sold if the family who owns one is rather desperate for money.

Mrs R has a bit of a soft spot for medals, she has a few that belonged to her forebears and, even though they are fairly ordinary, she can't imagine ever parting with them.

The Victoria Cross is so precious, so personal, each one has a story that could rarely be retold by the recipient because they died not knowing they had done something "For Valour", something that saved other people's lives. That very special medal was often the only precious  thing their family ever had - imagine reaching the decision to sell it, and imagine having enough money to be able to buy one, and then be able to buy some more. No, Mrs R can't imagine  either scenario, not really. Don't, please, imagine that she's jealous, because she isn't.

Anyhow, she decided to find out more about Lord Ashcroft, who, to be honest, up to that point had been just a name. She was very surprised by what she learned.

He was born in Belize, his father was working there, which is probably a good reason to carry on living there for part, or all, of the year. He's a pretty astute businessman too, and often has a bit of spare cash lying around so he thinks of interesting ways to spend it - and he doesn't spend it all on champagne, fancy yachts and high living.

In 1988 Michael Ashcroft founded Crimestoppers. He did that following the murder of PC Keith Blakelock in London in 1985, and was instrumental in launching a similar organisation in New Zealand, also called Crimestoppers, following his donation of £120k for the return of stolen New Zealand [Victoria Crosses]. See the link between the two things - giving scared people the chance to do the decent thing, even anonymously - that's brave, it takes courage.

He gave £5million to Anglia Ruskin University, towards building the Business School, as well as funding scholarships there for students from Belize. Nine scholarships, not just the one.

He founded Ashcroft Technology Academy in Wandsworth and he's done 'green' things too,  trying to save whales.

He has funded many events for Help for Heroes, all the proceeds from some books he's written about soldierly things go to that charity too.

He has also bought many, many, of the aforementioned Victoria Crosses so a trust was established to protect the collection. The medals are now 'on loan' to the Imperial War Museum, which also received a donation of £5million to pay for the gallery in which they are displayed.

It's a heck of a lot to do for Britain, and for British people. You'd think any one of them would go down quite well. All that money, his money, none of these things has taken a bean from the taxpayer. In fact he probably saved the taxpayer quite a bit, and did things the government wouldn't ever have imagined doing with public money, and that's why Mrs Rigby got wordy in the early hours of the morning, and defended him - and butterflies.

You know, quite a lot of people do a lot of good things, they don't actually ask for anything in return. Many of them give time, because that's all they have to spare, but some people have spare cash, a lot of spare cash, and they do decent things with it. The proper term for these people is philanthropists, there were an awful lot of philanthropists around in Victorian times. (More about those pesky Victorians another time.) The only other alive person Mrs R has heard of who's personally funded a school is Sir John Robert Madejski (knighted 2009). He also built a new football stadium in Reading, and bought the football club to go in it - and that's why she knows his name, because she spotted the name of the football stadium in a headline and looked it up to try to find out how to pronounce it. If Mrs Rigby ever had a lot of money she'd pay for a lifeboat, and see if they'd name it after one of her forebears who had a bit of bother in WW1 and never managed to walk properly again, not without a pair of walking sticks - but it's not likely to happen, although it's quite a nice dream.

And that's it really, nothing much more to say, except that Mrs R now understands that all this fuss is about some of Lord Ashcroft's money not ending up where some people think it should. It seems that 'non-doms' register that their 'domicile' is not Britain, so pay some (or all) of their income tax somewhere else in the world and because they earn a lot they pay a lot of tax, so the government thinks it's missing out, it's not fair, especially when they realise they could have 50% of Lord Ashcroft's earnings. And they've had a seriously hissy fit in his case because he also gave some money to the Tory Party, which they don't think is fair, and he's their Deputy Chairman, and he's rich, whilst Labour has got Harriet Harman for their Deputy, and she gets wages from the taxpayer, and some expenses or two, so can't give them anything, not even money from her relatives. Maybe he also gave the Tories more than anybody except the Unions (via the membership subscription  levy) have given Labour, which makes them doubly jealous? The thing is that he does pay tax here though, because everything he buys whilst in Britain generates at least 17.5% VAT - Mrs R can't imagine he gets many things from charity shops.

Oh, an aside, about 'domicile'.

Did you know that if you make a Will you live in England or Wales and then move to Scotland, your Will is automatically invalid if you don't tell a lawyer your 'place of domicile' is England  or Wales - otherwise Scottish law takes over and can rule you intestate.

Back to Lord Ashcroft, and some very common sense from Dizzy
If I have a job in the UK I pay tax here. If I have a job in Spain but I commute from the UK, I should pay tax in Spain because that is where I earned the money. This idea that if you earn money abroad, but spend it somewhere else, you should be taxed where you spend it seems to me absurd. Now, I realise some might find this a terrible thought, but it just seems like common sense to me.
There is more, please read the original post.

The last words on this matter should, on this blog at least, perhaps come from the BBC's Nick Robinson :
It is unpatriotic - the home secretary claimed - for the Tories to take so much money from a man who chooses not to be a full British taxpayer.
If so, all three of the UK's major parties are unpatriotic because they have all taken major sums from so-called "non-doms"

It is wrong, many say, and, indeed, it will soon be illegal to sit in Parliament making laws in Britain whilst avoiding paying taxes here.

If so, Lord Ashcroft is not the only one doing so. Lord Paul - a Labour donor - is also a "non-dom" and Gordon Brown promoted him to the Privy Council.
....

Again.

Another photographer stopped, in Manchester.

Here

He says
[an official in a red jacket] decided that I wasn't allowed to take pictures of him and the PCSO doing their job, I explained that I was and took another picture to prove it. He then instructed the PCSO to get my details and began ranting about terrorists and not wanting his picture in the paper.
Luckily he knew what to say, and what to do, because
As a retired officer with 30 years experience I am confident in dealing with these situations but many people aren't. I am baffled by the idea that anyone would think me a terrorist threat. Why would terrorists look for pictures of enforcement officers in newspapers and then target them?  Many Police Officers appear in Public relations photographs and to my knowledge none of them have been knobbled by Al Qaeda. I am living testament to that, as a Community Constable I was encouraged to get my photo in the local paper whenever possible.
Read the whole post, also the follow up comments, there are some useful pointers - in case it ever happens to you.

And, by the way, Robert Norbury has some rather nice photographs on his other site. Enjoy.
....

Monday, 1 March 2010

Antipodean flying fish

Residents in a remote desert town in Australia, 326 miles from the nearest river, are recovering after witnessing two days of fish raining from the sky.

Odd, they didn't blame it on AGW
....

Gordon Brown's abstemious schooldays.

Taken from a newspaper mini-biography :-
... Gordon concluded his piece with a typically opinionated flourish: "Let us hope that this plan will be a success and that the sale of drink and cigarettes to the younger and older generation will fall when these [commercials] against drink and cigarettes are shown."
It sounds rather like a political campaign, or a submission to an inquiry that eventually resulted in the banning of tobacco commercials.

Actually though, it wasn't.

The clue is in the title.

Mrs Rigby is quoting from an article entitled "The Making of Gordon Brown", carried in the in Daily Telegraph dated 9th June 2007. It's a lengthy piece well worth revisiting, and was written by Andrew Pierce and Richard Alleyne " ... who hear[d] the recollections of family and friends - many speaking for the first time - about the extraordinary talents and moral purpose of the young Gordon ..." who was, on 27th June 2007, to take over the role of Prime Minister of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

So when did he use speak out against the evils of both tobacco and alcohol?
In April 1962, aged 11, he wrote an article about a church campaign in favour of television commercials against the twin demons of alcohol and tobacco.
Makes you think, doesn't it.

At age 11 in 1962 most boys were still in short trousers, they played  cowboys and Indians,or perhaps reinvented WW2 whilst mimicking Biggles.

According to the more senior Rigbys, in 1962 televisions were still uncommon in working people's homes -  they had to make do with their old radiogram for quite a while longer and when they got one viewing was stricly limited, regulated by the number of shillings needed to feed the electricity meter under the stairs.

Oh, and in case you're interested, the first UK commercial was shown at 8.12 pm on Sept 22 1955, it was for toothpaste.
The commercial owed its prime placing to chance. The Gibbs advertisement had come first in a lottery drawn with 23 other advertisements, including those for Guinness, Surf, National Benzole, Brown & Polson Custard and Summer County Margarine.
....

A Bank Holiday for David.

Today is March 1st - Dydd Gŵyl Dewi Sant, St David's Day.

St David is the Patron Saint of Wales.

The government's website tells us that different parts of Britain have different arrangements for Bank Holidays.

The people of Northern Ireland are indeed fortunate.
In Northern Ireland, there are ten permanent bank holidays - the same eight as in England and Wales, plus St Patrick's Day and the Anniversary of the Battle of the Boyne in 1690.
Scotland has, at first glance, one fewer, but additional Bank Holidays can be arranged locally.
There are nine statutory bank holidays across the whole of Scotland. There are also other public or local holidays which can be determined by local authorities, based on local tradition. Since 2007, St Andrew's Day has been an alternative, voluntary public holiday, which can replace an existing local holiday.
The situation in England and Wales is certainly less than equal.
There are currently eight permanent bank holidays in England and Wales
Despite representation, despite petitions, and despite 'equality' laws, the current government has steadfastly refused to allow the people of England and Wales to take a day off work to celebrate the life of their Patron Saint.

We Rigbys spent many happy years in North Wales, and even took the time to learn the fantastically expressive and melodic language, but sadly the skill is more than a little rusty now - but we can still sing the National Anthem.

Join in, if you can, if not then enjoy the words and scenery of God's beautiful country.



Here are the words.
Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau
Mae hen wlad fy nhadau yn annwyl i mi,
Gwlad beirdd a chantorion, enwogion o fri;
Ei gwrol ryfelwyr, gwladgarwyr tra mad,
Tros ryddid collasant eu gwaed.

Cytgan (Chorus)
Gwlad, gwlad, pleidiol wyf i'm gwlad,
Tra môr yn fur
I'r bur hoffbau,
O bydded i'r heniaith barhau.
(repeat chorus to sing along with this YouTube, do not continue)
Hen Gymru fynyddig, paradwys y bardd,
Pob dyffryn, pob clogwyn, i'm golwg sydd hardd;
Trwy deimlad gwladgarol, mor swynol yw si
Ei nentydd, afonydd, i mi.

Cytgan (Chorus)

Os treisiodd y gelyn fy ngwlad dan ei droed,
Mae hen iaith y Gymry mor fyw ag erioed,
Ni luddiwyd yr awen gan erchyll law brad,
Na thelyn berseiniol fy ngwlad.

Cytgan (Chorus)

Dydd Gwyl Dewi hapus i bawb !
....

Nick Hogan

...
Travel via Dick Puddlecote to Old Holborn, where you will find a button to donate a penny or two to Nick Hogan who has been sent to gaol for "non payment of a fine" , having been fined a total of £11,000 for, allegedly, allowing people to smoke in his pub.

To quote from OH
Nick was actually jailed for non-payment of the fine originally imposed for a 'mass smoke-in' on the day the ban came into force in 2007 in his pub, the 'Swan and Barristers' in Bolton. He no longer has that pub. He was fined again when council inspectors walked into his present pub and discovered a group of customers smoking - Nick wasn't even on the premises.

Nick is bankrupt, and had gone to court intending to argue that he could not afford the £500 a month payments demanded by the council towards their £11,600 bill for prosecuting him. He has already paid off £1,600. The court gave him a six month sentence instead, and he is currently in Forest Bank prison in Pendlebury, unable to help to earn the money which would ensure his release.
Please take a few moments to read both Dick Puddlecote's and OH's blogs.

When you have done that think for a moment, especially if you're one of those people who enjoys a well-regulated life.

Try to forget, for a moment, whether you are a smoker or not, forget any preconceived prejudices you may have about smoking and the associated health risks. Think instead, for a moment, about how you may have been persuaded encouraged told it's just fine to single out one section of the population and make laws to isolate them, to make them stand apart from the rest, and make them the subject of public derision. Think how this sector of the population has, almost without exception, meekly obeyed these new laws.

Think about how it's fine to create draconian laws to punish these people. Think about how it's fine for you to tell these people they are filthy, how it's fine for you to order them about, how it's fine for you to call them murderers, and how it's fine for you to telephone the police and get them arrested for breaking a law that would not otherwise invoke a criminal penalty.

Then look around you, and consider other sectors of the population whose lifestyles differ from yours, and how they might do things that irritate or annoy you, things that are currently 100% legal, permitted, within the law.

Would you like all these people to stop making your life a misery?

Of course you would, it'd make your life easier. You would be free to go wherever you want without the irritation of interacting with people who are 'different', no door would be closed for you, everywhere will be safe - for you.

There will be no risk of visiting that house where there's so much air freshener it makes you cough, no risk of visiting the lady who wears so much perfume that the smell lingers on your clothes and gives your child an asthma attack.

That woman with six cats would be banned, they dig up your carrots, and their fur makes you sneeze.

The chav with the big dog would be next, it looks fierce, and sometimes barks.

That labourer across the road whose old diesel car rattles when he starts it every morning, and which leaves behind a trail of carcinogenic exhaust, would have to stop.

Those new folk would have to change their menu because you don't like the smell, and as for the barbecue-every-evening-in-the-summer family - they're done for because they're going to make the planet burn up.

Think about all the new laws that could, if you wanted them, make your life so much easier.

And, of course, you would never do anything that could annoy others, not ever, not in a million years ......

Or would you?
....

Sunday, 28 February 2010

Opinion Poll weightings.

From Political Betting Feb 26th
Guest slot from flockers on yougov

What is it about their weightings?

For good reason, all polling firms apply weightings to their raw data in order to derive the final figures. There is little value in seeking to predict the responses of the electorate from the responses of a sample if that sample is not representative of the electorate as a whole; a poll taken in the Birkenhead working men’s club would have very little predictive value.


Looking at the YouGov data, I was immediately struck (see table above) by the resilience of the unweighted Conservative vote share and of the unweighted Conservative lead over Labour.
Read the whole item at Political Betting.


Mike Smithson is ...
... on holiday ... at the moment and this guest slot submitted by Flockers echoes quite a lot of comments that we are getting whenever YouGov polls are published - which is now five times a week. When I return next week I’m hoping that the firm’s Peter Kellner will take part in an online Q&A session - no doubt this will form part of the conversation. I should emphasise that these are the personal views of Flockers - Mike Smithson
The Q & A will be interesting to read.
....

The (carbon) science of Whales.

Via NotaSheep and from BBC
"A century of whaling may have released more than 100 million tonnes - or a large forest's worth - of carbon into the atmosphere, scientists say.

Whales store carbon within their huge bodies and when they are killed, much of this carbon can be released."
Presumably, according to the scientists quoted by the BBC, whales would live for ever if they weren't hunted, otherwise they would never die naturally and "release the body-trapped carbon into the atmosphere"?

Nope, they've got that one covered too
"If they die where it's deep enough, it will be [stored] out of the atmosphere perhaps for hundreds of years."
Maybe they didn't notice events like this.

Mr Eugenides has something to say about "saving the whale" but, you see, that might not be the point because they always wrap up their objectives in pretty ideas. This scientist let the cat out of his metaphorical bag and ...
... suggested that a similar system of carbon credits could be applied to whales 
and
"The idea would be to do a full accounting of how much carbon you could store in a fully populated stock of fish or whales, and allow countries to sell their fish quota as carbon credits," he explained.
They are soooooo determined to keep carbon trading alive, there must be a lot of money tied up in it, fortunes to be made and lost, especially at a time when some national currencies are a bit dodgy.
....

Saturday, 27 February 2010

Yougov and The Stone Club.

Taking a stroll round the internet Mrs Rigby spotted this job advert
Reference:2346
Posted: 09 February 10
working for YouGov Plc
Salary £225 a week three month contract
YouGovStone (a subsidiary of YouGov), the online opinion leader research company, is looking for someone to provide additional back-up to Carole Stone in keeping her legendary database up to date and helping to organise the detailed arrangements for events and debates for both YouGovStone and TheStoneClub. This joint role as an administrator and events organiser is an opportunity for someone who wants to be involved in current issues, politics and the media.
closes 31 March 2010. We may appoint before the closing date.
contact Send a CV and covering letter to saqi.sheikh @ yougov.com
website yougov.com
Now that advert didn't seem quite right, because it was asking for somebody to work for one organisation (YouGovStone) whilst linking the advert to another one (YouGov). Wouldn't it be a bit like Kraft advertising a job at "Kraft" itself, when the small print tells you it's really at one of the subsidiaries - Cadbury's or Heinz. Or would it?

Mrs R had never heard of YouGovStone / The Stone Club, so she looked it up and found this site
YouGovStone is a joint venture between leading online market research agency YouGov and business consultant Carole Stone.
We deliver in-depth insight by asking people of influence their views on subjects that matter to us all.
Here's more about Carole Stone, who was once producer of BBC Radio 4’s discussion programme "Any Questions?"   
Working with chairmen and chief executives of large companies and charities Carole brings together politicians, journalists and business people – today’s opinion formers – to discuss issues of mutual interest. She also holds regular ‘salons’ at her home in London’s Covent Garden both to introduce people to each other and to focus on particular topics.
Now, as Managing Director of YouGovStone, Carole has developed these activities inviting opinion formers to consider and provide feedback on the most important issues facing the country today.
The Stone Club
TheStoneClub is a private members' club. We have two tiers of membership.
Silver (£500 pa +VAT)
Membership is for those who want a regular monthly 'salon' - wine and conversation sparked off by a controversial topical speaker We call it: In Conversation With ... Silver members are invited to two debates a year, backed by YouGovStone research, on major issues that affect us all. And there are Summer drinks and a Christmas party for all TheStoneClub members.
Gold (£1,000 pa +VAT)
Members have all the benefits of Silver but membership is more business focused. There is a monthly Breakfast when TheStoneClub members are briefed by experts from the worlds of business, politics and the media. We will be' taking the temperature' on topical issues of concern to us all.
Okay, so Mrs Rigby has admitted to not being particularly smart about some things, and as far as businesses like this go she really hasn't got a clue. But she does think that sort of membership fee is quite a lot. She couldn't be a member, her pocket money isn't anything like enough so this club seems quite exclusive, or maybe open to people who can perhaps put their membership fees against their business expenses. Maybe?

It's far too late on a Saturday night, not really the best time to try to think sensibly, which is probably why Mrs R can't work out how the two things (organisations) can go together and allow the one to impartially measure opinion, whilst the other seems to be taking money to form opinion based on who is invited to speak at the various functions.

YouGov is meant to be carrying out very regular pre-election opinion surveys, which are intended to measure public opinion.


Can anybody help her out with an explanation please, how a private club, an apparently opinion-forming club, can be linked with a group that's supposed to be completely impartial.

Anybody?

Please?
....